No such thing as a good hire in the abstract.Read the manifesto
ALTERNATIVES

Superposition vs. Juicebox

Juicebox is a tool. Superposition is the recruiter.

$500
Per agent, per month
15%
Success fee, on placement
90d
Replacement guarantee

A tool doesn't make a hire. A recruiter does.

  • Retained recruiters.
  • LinkedIn Recruiter seats.
  • Keyword-matched resumes.
  • Templated InMails.

Juicebox is a candidate search tool. It takes natural-language queries and returns profiles: a smarter LinkedIn Recruiter, faster filters, less keyword juggling. Useful for recruiters who already know what to do with a list.

But a list of profiles isn't a hire. Someone still has to evaluate each person, write outreach that gets a reply, run screening calls, chase schedules, and manage candidates through the offer. At a startup without a dedicated recruiter, that someone is the founder, which defeats the point of buying a tool.

Juicebox optimizes the 10% of recruiting that's searching. Superposition provides the other 90%: the high-taste reasoning and actions that actually close the hire.

Why teams without a recruiter pick Superposition

01

We're not a tool, we're the recruiter

Superposition doesn't hand you a search interface. We run the search, write the outreach, screen the candidates, and send you a shortlist of people ready to meet. You operate Juicebox. We operate on your behalf.

02

Deep research per candidate

Our agent doesn't stop at a LinkedIn profile. It reads their code, writing, side projects, and work history to evaluate real fit, not just keyword overlap.

03

Outcome-based pricing

Our incentives are aligned to filling the role, not just handing you a tool and a list to sift through yourself. You pay when we deliver someone you actually hire.

04

Built for founders without a talent team

Juicebox is another SaaS interface to learn and operate. If you're a founder shipping product between hiring rounds, you won't have the time or the desire. Superposition is the recruiter you'd hire, minus the hire.

Questions.
Answered.

Natural-language candidate search. Describing who you want in a sentence and getting a list is genuinely faster than boolean strings.

At the list. Once you have candidates, somebody has to write to each one, answer replies, screen and schedule. That is the part that consumes the week.

Different. Rather than returning a ranked list, it writes a paragraph on why each person fits your requirements and where they fall short, which is what you actually argue with.

Yes. Some teams run their own searches and hand candidates to the agent for outreach and screening, which it treats exactly like the ones it found.

Hire a recruiter, not a search box.

Juicebox makes search faster. Superposition makes the hire happen.