No such thing as a good hire in the abstract.Read the manifesto
VERSUS

Superposition vs Paraform

One sends your role to a network of recruiters. The other runs the search itself.

1
Agent, one company
0
Recruiters to manage
15%
On base salary only

Two different bets on who does the work

  • Posting a role and waiting.
  • Chasing recruiters for updates.
  • Percentage fees on equity.
  • Losing the candidate thread.

Paraform is a marketplace. You post a role, recruiters in their network opt in, and the ones who like the brief start sourcing. When one of them places a candidate, you pay a percentage of first-year salary. The pitch is access: you reach a pool of specialist recruiters without signing a retainer with any of them.

Superposition is not a marketplace. There is no recruiter on the other end deciding whether your role is worth their week. An agent takes the brief, reads the internet for people who fit it, writes to them from your mailbox, handles the replies, and books the interviews. You see every candidate and every message.

The practical difference shows up in the middle of a search. On a marketplace, a role that is hard, niche or slow to close gets quietly deprioritised in favour of easier ones. An agent has no other clients to move to.

Where each one actually wins

01

Paraform wins on human judgement in a niche

If your role lives in a world where a specific recruiter has spent ten years building relationships, that person's network beats any crawler. Marketplaces are how you rent that.

02

Superposition wins on coverage and consistency

The agent reads personal sites, GitHub, papers and talks, not just the recruiters' own lists, and it works the same way on week six as it did on day one.

03

You keep the thread either way, but only one of them is yours

Outreach goes from your own mailbox, replies land in your inbox, and the relationship with the candidate belongs to your company rather than an intermediary.

04

Cost lands differently

A marketplace fee is a percentage on placement. Superposition is a flat monthly fee per agent plus a success fee on base salary only, so the cost of a long search is predictable rather than a surprise at the end.

Side-by-side

Compare the workflow, not just the feature list.

Feature
Superposition
Paraform
Who does the sourcing
An agent, working only your roles
Independent recruiters who opt into your role
Where candidates come from
The open web: personal sites, GitHub, papers, talks, plus your own network
Each recruiter's personal network and tooling
Outreach sender
Your mailbox, or a warmed domain we run for you
The recruiter, usually from their own address
Who replies to candidates
The agent, from your brief, escalating what only you can answer
The recruiter
Pricing model
Flat monthly per agent, plus a success fee on base salary
Percentage of first-year salary on placement
If a role is hard
The agent keeps running it
Recruiters can move to an easier role
Interview coordination
Booked, chased and recorded by the agent
Varies by recruiter
What you keep afterwards
Every profile, message and decision in your account
Whatever the recruiter shares

Pricing and features checked 21 September 2026. Tell us if something is out of date.

Questions.
Answered.

Yes, and some teams do. A common split is to run the agent on roles where the candidate pool is wide and findable, and hand genuinely relationship-driven roles to a specialist recruiter.

You are the human in the loop. The agent escalates anything the brief cannot answer, and every outreach can be held for your approval before it sends.

You stop the search and the monthly fee stops with it. There is no success fee unless someone is hired.

Yes. Outreach goes from your address, replies land in your mailbox, and the full history stays in your account.

Run the search yourself.

Tell us the role and we will show you who the agent would write to first, before you commit to anything.